Since the dawn of time we have often occupied with searching for any form of leverage that helps us dominate our fellow man. At first it was fire. Then sticks. Then steel. Then fire and steel. Then force of steel. Then force of fire. And then finally digital. (Full Stop) But how do we dominate with digital? A rather abstract form of stick. Seems we are finding plenty of ways.
So, how sustainable are those ways in digital form if they “offend” the underlying and intertwining natural code that constrains? That mysterious and elusive primal actor in the universe theorized to exist. In ways that are now unfolding through large and creative data review. Let’s look behind the data veil at some new perspectives in computational logic and code. Ones that, on considerable evidence, works with and not against our scientific and overall progress. Naturally. Working in energy. In transportation. In medicine and longevity. In computational efficiency. In communications. And in almost every other form of life science and process. If it were, as they say, a truly underpinning set of rules, it would have the propensity to affect all things of life and our universe within that set of rules. It would, on success, indeed affect all things. Let’s explore if this postulate can meet such strict rules of tenure.
Associative Subjective Memory (“ASM”)
In order to begin to conceive of our BioCode, Associative Subjective Memory must be understood. It can be a rather abstract concept at first. However, it’s evidence in measurable, scientific reality can support to validate it’s existence. You see, ASM is a concept of memory. One that can potentially exist in every greater and smaller parcel in the universe. Quarks to dancing black holes. The whole spin. Including us. Which we often think are insignificant in the universe. Particularly when we measure purely by one view. Say the “size” of something. We are mere specks compared to the size and energy of a massive sun.
Each system, greater or smaller, has a form of memory. To know how to act, dance, interact, or not, within the whole pile. In small ecosystems. In greater ones. In soup recipes. And in some special code. Each knows what to do. Our questions simply was, “How?”. How does each and all remember what to do? Even if has has no genetics? There had to exist some platform from which all pieces acted. The code behind the code. The hidden secrets to the very fabric of life itself. Or life and all the universe would be thrown into chaos. Yet, it continues to work and even surprise us on occasion.
Memory, as any form, operates within a system. One which we, on premise, should in a universal way, operate as any other system. With the same set of rules. If a stone hits a pond. The rules that apply to it should also apply to memory. We know it sounds abstract. But just go with it. So if you find the overlapping rules in each case. You have some form of “Associative Memory” between two seemingly unrelated things. It’s when such associations show causal relationships (cause and effect) it forms in the subjective. The objectively obtained set of subjective rules that govern BioCode. Basically, the rules of BioCode revealed through the process of discernment and discovery.
Let’s look at Postulate Number One, for some clarity. As a bit of anything “experiences” and acts, or not, throughout matter, there is a subjective force placed on proximal interactions that have direct, codable associations: 1. Lasting, 2. Partially-Lasting, 3. Limited, 4. Rejuvenating, 5. Cyclical, and 6. Echoed, effects in code. It is displayed in many areas of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, and many other areas. They are the six memory-related attributes that are measured to exist in all systems. And certainly theorized for all those immeasurable systems. But in the case of a human memory and the stone in the pond, careful examination will show that all six (6) attributes of BioCode do indeed co-exist. Supporting a measurable view in support of a somehow panpsychologic universe. Whether the subject is a distant cold rock in the universe or your any one memory. A connection.
It was in the further mathematical and geometric analysis of this insightful data in which we built the framework for the BioCode. It does help from one clearly useful vantage point. Any analysis with the code does reveal, to the degree observable and measurable, disparity from the functioning “Norm” in a system. The degree to which the operating system is out of balance to the operating norms of code.
In itself, this may not appear to be significant in scientific review. However, thanks to Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951) who cleverly wrote, “to identify relationship between language and reality and to define its limits in science”, was indeed profound to purpose. In it’s clever solve lies the foundations of the code of life. As we call it, the “BioCode”. A postulate in purpose that, as applied well, can even ease the sore feet of a butterfly. Imagine what it can do for you?
We are building the BioCode, and other related technologies, at Genie Aerospace PLC, into useful and peaceful technologies. Working toward improved human medicine and longevity. How long would you like to live? How long is too long? Soon, questions from your doctor. In a world gentled to “in tune” with the natural code that guides it and us. A tune that resonates in truth.
